The truth about veganism, plant-based foods and their impact on the environment

Shopping for groceries over the last year or so, the most prolific change in the aisles that I have seen is the section of space that is now being given over to plant-based products and vegan products.

It’s not that I have an issue with veganism per se, but it’s interesting that this is given far more priority over removing the number of products containing palm oil from the shelves and replacing it with that which doesn’t. I say this because veganism and plant-based foods are often mistaken as a diet that is planet friendly and foods that are going to save the environment and most importantly and supposedly YOU.

This is where the lines get blurred and the truth gets masked in illusions. Truth be known, the continued use of palm oil is far more devastating for the planet and the environment. And the demand for vegan-friendly staples such as avocados and almonds is actually depleting the planet of resources, rather than helping.

Here are some facts about veganism and plant-based foods and their impact on the environment:

Popularity of avocados is fueling deforestation 

The popularity of avocados, a staple in vegan cuisine, is fueling deforestation because Mexican farmers are leveling pine forests to illegally plant these “green gold” fruit trees to meet the world’s desire for avocados.

Avocado production is concentrated in the state of Michoacán where most of the plantations are controlled by the Caballeros Templarios Drug Cartel who force local farmers to give up a portion of their income on top of the taxes they charge for fruit sold and land owned. Those who don’t play by their rules are murdered – thus the term “blood guacamole.”

According to Greenpeace Mexico, “Beyond the displacement of forests and the effects on water retention, the high use of agricultural chemicals and the large volumes of wood needed to pack and ship avocados are other factors that could have negative effects on the area’s environment and the well-being of its inhabitants.”

Avocado plantations, on the other hand, need repeated cycles of chemical inputs. They drink up irrigation water too, lots of it, putting pressure on local water reserves. It takes approximately 272 litres of water just to grow about half a kilogram (two or three medium-sized) avocados.

In California, avocados now vie with almonds as the top water-guzzling crop.

A study commissioned by food-tech company It’s Fresh! found the amount of CO2 it takes for a package of two Hass avocados cultivated in Chile to reach consumers in the UK – where the avocado has risen to a £187 million ($242 million) industry – add a whopping 846.37 grams of carbon dioxide to our planet’s atmosphere.

To put that number in context, that’s almost twice as much as a kilo of bananas (480g), more than 3x the amount of a large cappuccino (235g), and 40x more than a large coffee or tea. That steep CO2 figure doesn’t even incorporate the fact that Chilean avocados are one of the thirstiest fruits around, requiring nearly 97 gallons of irrigated water to produce a single pound.

Almonds require litres of water to produce

It takes approximately 15 gallons of water to produce just 16 almonds, making almonds one of the most water-intensive crops in the state of California, which itself has been suffering from a water shortage.

Since there are more than two billion almonds being produced in California, it’s easy to see why the amount of water being diverted for this purpose is large enough to be cause for alarm. And because many almonds are being grown on land that has been converted from natural lands or farms growing low water crops to meet the rising demand for almonds, the resulting increased irrigation needs have been dramatic.

Almond milk’s consumption as an alternative to dairy milk for vegans and lactose-intolerant coffee drinkers alike has surged in popularity in recent years in both the US and the UK.

Many people choose almond milk for having a smaller carbon footprint when compared with dairy milk. However, almond milk takes a toll on the environment in other ways. The main issues associated with almond milk production are water use and pesticide use, which may produce long lasting effects on the environment in drought-stricken California, where more than 80% of the world’s almonds are grown.

Critics of almond milk’s status as a healthy alternative say that there aren’t enough nutritional benefits to justify the gallons of water necessary to grow almonds.

Soybeans are contributing to deforestation

Soybeans are a go-to non-dairy substitute for many vegans, but the production of soybeans is having devastating effects on the environment.

Soy cultivation is a major driver of deforestation in the Amazon basin. Without proper safeguards, the soybean industry is causing widespread deforestation and displacement of small farmers and indigenous peoples around the globe.

Rosa Medea is Life & Soul Magazine’s Chief @rosamedea

7 thoughts on “The truth about veganism, plant-based foods and their impact on the environment

  1. It doesn’t have to be one or the other, you can be vegan and avoid palm oil.

    There’s really no reason for anyone to not be vegan at this point; and to suggest that veganism is worse for the environment than animal agriculture is absolutely ludacris, given that animals eat only plants and animal ag is the leading cause of co2 emissions.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. The article is neither suggesting nor stating that “veganism is worse for the environment than animal agriculture”. It is simple providing facts – facts that are often remiss in mainstream media or sources of information


      1. In the beginning you said you don’t “have a problem” with veganism, showing that you don’t understand it at all; No one could possibly have a problem with not unnecessarily using and killing animals – that’s just silly.

        And I would definitely not call any of that factual information, they are pseudoscientific (and irrelevant) myths at best.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I’m neither a farmer nor scientist, but I agree there is nothing simple about feeding the whole planet and doing the right thing. A first world problem worrying about what to eat when most people, including in this country, worry about affording to eat at all. Moderation in everything – I know vegans and vegetarians feel they have the moral high ground as they are not killing any creature, but the animals that create our countryside and fertilise the soil are only there because we eat them! Whatever we eat seems to be at the expense of the environment, or wild life – not to mention farmers being murdered by drugs cartels!

    Liked by 3 people

  3. (9 percent of 2016 greenhouse gas emissions) – Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture come from livestock such as cows, agricultural soils, and rice production. Animals and agriculture contribute 9 percent to the problem.
    Livestock has been around a very long time and the emissions from livestock and humans alike were offset by a vast amount of forested areas. Forest are now being removed to plant high demand crops. Every time trees are clear-cut for any reason no matter how noble, the removal is contributing to the issues and that makes humans, vegan, vegetarian, omnivore the main problem. Because the forest is removed to meet the needs of humans just as livestock is raised to meet the needs of humans.

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.